Okay.
alt_amycus needs his own discussion: two posts in an evening. And, omg, I'm terrified for
alt_terry!
What do you suppose Amycus's "new regimen" lists mean?
I thought the first one was some sort of list of punishments in code, but "2 pair trousers" doesn't seem to fit. Perhaps he's trying experimental pigeon extermination strategies? But again, "2 pair trousers"? Am I making this harder than it needs to be?
What do you suppose Amycus's "new regimen" lists mean?
I.
4L x 3D
Tx30
CCx4
results marginal
pigeons
II.
4L x 2D
2 pair trousers
5 CC but scattered.
I thought the first one was some sort of list of punishments in code, but "2 pair trousers" doesn't seem to fit. Perhaps he's trying experimental pigeon extermination strategies? But again, "2 pair trousers"? Am I making this harder than it needs to be?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 08:21 am (UTC)CC might be Cruciatus Curse?
If it's a punishment record, the first line might be the list of transgressions -- 4 late, 3 default? Then a summary of punishments (Tx30 sounds ominous), then the results.
Need more info! *admires evil player*
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 12:06 pm (UTC)http://alt-terry.livejournal.com/7703.html?thread=43031#t43031
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 01:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 01:10 pm (UTC)T = transfigurations? (what else besides the dog might Terry have been temporarily?) If Terry turns up missing again, I'd suggest Minerva check out the pigeon population.
Benign possibilities are out there, too, of course:
L = lunch; D = dinner
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 01:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 01:30 pm (UTC)Don't know whether you've noticed, but Terry's journal has a new icon, sort of in "honor" of his master's joining the journal project. It's called, "Him."
--Terry's Player
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 01:42 pm (UTC)Thank you for pointing this out. I just looked at all Terry's icons and realise there are several I haven't seen before.
I'm rather expecting that we may see a Word-of-the-Day post again. I wonder if he works on those in advance. The last one seemed so well developed for a moment of extremis, that I wondered if he had a (mental) pile of them ready to go. Still, he had to write it out, and that seemed pretty amazing under the circumstances.
Of course with tonight's event, I wonder if a Word-of-the-Day post would give away the code by making its meaning especially obvious to the Carrows. Perhaps with all this advance notice of the "soiree" in the journals, Hermione and Pomfrey know to expect that Terry will need them without his having to send the signal?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 01:46 pm (UTC)L = lunch; D = dinner
Nope, definitely don't want to think about pigeons. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 01:53 pm (UTC)Of course, this explains neither the trousers nor the pigeons.
Perhaps Terry wears Long.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 01:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 02:08 pm (UTC)I note that the two series do not seem cummulative: in the first series, we have 3D and in the second series, 2D. Furthermore, "Tx30" in the first series shares the same rank with "2 pair trousers" in the second series (T is probably not "30 pair trousers" -- if it refers to Terry, at least -- and, in any case, to go from 30 to 2 is not a matter of adding up).
I await further posts from
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 02:42 pm (UTC)This is sort of wonderfully absurd, no?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 02:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 03:05 pm (UTC)Are we simply more invested in the Carrow's current victim? Are we more closely aware of their deeds and more distanced from the details of Bella's daily life?
Edited for oh, my eyes, that apostrophe! and, um, general stupidity.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 03:08 pm (UTC)*pokes her*
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 03:20 pm (UTC)